the fifth name on the interview list for the toycamera book TOYCAM - Lo-fi Photography. Over the past year the book team collected hundreds of names, viewed many web-pages, Flickr galleries, and toycamera.com galleries. In the end we only had room for 6 interviews in the book, though we would have loved to talked to so many more of you.
So everyone please congratulate Jack Brull (aka Glider! We thoroughly enjoyed talking to him about his photography.
Friday, April 30, 2010
Friday, April 23, 2010
TOYCAM take 4! (finally)
the fourth name on the interview list for the toycamera book TOYCAM - Lo-fi Photography. Over the past year the book team collected hundreds of names, viewed many web-pages, Flickr galleries, and toycamera.com galleries. In the end we only had room for 6 interviews in the book, though we would have loved to talked to so many more of you.
So everyone please congratulate Gordon Stettinius (aka Eyecaramba)! We thoroughly enjoyed talking to him about his photography.
So everyone please congratulate Gordon Stettinius (aka Eyecaramba)! We thoroughly enjoyed talking to him about his photography.
Labels:
TOYCAM BOOK
Sunday, April 11, 2010
Iphonetography
Many photographers are discovering the iPhone camera as a potential creative tool. It is much maligned as a pretty terrible camera even for a cell phone. Many complain about the file size yada yada yada. A few have realized that the camera combined with the numerous camera and photo apps may actually be a tool to make some amazing images. Yeah you can't print these images very big, a few inches at max. But printing large is often the fall back of photographers trying to make their images have more of an impact than maybe their image really has. I mean everyone is impressed by giant prints, they cost more, and we all know that if it is big and costs more it must be awesome right? Well many people who know little about art do think this way, and if they happen to have lots of money then all the better :)
Anyway I hope the iPhone is showing us a glimpse of where digital cameras may go. Maybe you have seen that Polaroid has created a little Pogo camera that comes with a small printer giving you a digital way to recreate some of the experience of the old Polaroid camera with its instant film. Can you imagine that camera and printer combined with a few apps that allow you to visually recreate the old instant film? Or a digital camera and printer all in one with all of these iPhone style apps that allow you to edit in the field? Don't get me wrong I love film, but I love photography more than any aspect of it. Give me an iPhone camera with a few more megapixels and all of the apps and the ability to print anywhere in the field and I will use it.
I am going to make a regular part of this blog a sampling of the images I have and will create with the iPhone and all of the apps. I will do my best to list the apps used, but I am not going to go into the details of exactly how the images were created. Here is the first image. It was created by a composite of 3 separate images and a combination of the AutoStuch, Cool fx, and PhotoStudio apps.
Anyway I hope the iPhone is showing us a glimpse of where digital cameras may go. Maybe you have seen that Polaroid has created a little Pogo camera that comes with a small printer giving you a digital way to recreate some of the experience of the old Polaroid camera with its instant film. Can you imagine that camera and printer combined with a few apps that allow you to visually recreate the old instant film? Or a digital camera and printer all in one with all of these iPhone style apps that allow you to edit in the field? Don't get me wrong I love film, but I love photography more than any aspect of it. Give me an iPhone camera with a few more megapixels and all of the apps and the ability to print anywhere in the field and I will use it.
I am going to make a regular part of this blog a sampling of the images I have and will create with the iPhone and all of the apps. I will do my best to list the apps used, but I am not going to go into the details of exactly how the images were created. Here is the first image. It was created by a composite of 3 separate images and a combination of the AutoStuch, Cool fx, and PhotoStudio apps.
Labels:
iPhone Images
Friday, April 9, 2010
PX100 - Round 2
Ok so I took the SX-70 Sonar to Easter with the Fam loaded with my second pack PX100. The day was pretty overcast but still bright enough that you could wear sunglasses. Temperature was in the high 70's (degrees F). Learning the lessons from the first pack I kept all of the subjects (the Fam) close and focused on getting a good image. As you can see from the first image these conditions produced very good detail and the contrast is much better than the first pack. The light/dark dial was centered for all of the images.
As I said in my last post I thought that this film could use a bit of adjustment in photoshop. Now I am not very experienced work in color but I think this next image shows the potential. The tricky part is trying to keep the same color tones.
This next image has the lens pointed in the direction of the sun and you can see that as you would expect the image is a bit more washed out. I did use Photoshop to darken the image.
Here is another image with no Photoshop adjustments (other than to make it look as close to the original as possible). The images after this show a few experiments adding body heat to the development.
This image was developed in my pocket and heat was added via friction from rubbing my hand over the image for about 30 seconds. The image is darker and has a slight red tone as we expect. The shadow detail tends to go away. This method also is pretty hard to control since you can't see what is happening when the image is in your pocket. I tried twice more to replicate this and both times the results were darker and more red.
I decided to test out my idea from the last post. I shot this image with the dial 1 tick toward the white side of the dial (giving more exposure). I placed the image in my pocket to develop, checking it every 5-10 seconds until I saw that the image was primarily showing yellow and brown tones yet still had some of the light blue tones from the protective paste. At this point I started rubbing the image between my hands creating heat. I was able to significantly darken the image yet keeping the red tones from showing up. I am going to practice this technique as it has thus far produced the best tones and contrast.
As I said in my last post I thought that this film could use a bit of adjustment in photoshop. Now I am not very experienced work in color but I think this next image shows the potential. The tricky part is trying to keep the same color tones.
This next image has the lens pointed in the direction of the sun and you can see that as you would expect the image is a bit more washed out. I did use Photoshop to darken the image.
Here is another image with no Photoshop adjustments (other than to make it look as close to the original as possible). The images after this show a few experiments adding body heat to the development.
This image was developed in my pocket and heat was added via friction from rubbing my hand over the image for about 30 seconds. The image is darker and has a slight red tone as we expect. The shadow detail tends to go away. This method also is pretty hard to control since you can't see what is happening when the image is in your pocket. I tried twice more to replicate this and both times the results were darker and more red.
I decided to test out my idea from the last post. I shot this image with the dial 1 tick toward the white side of the dial (giving more exposure). I placed the image in my pocket to develop, checking it every 5-10 seconds until I saw that the image was primarily showing yellow and brown tones yet still had some of the light blue tones from the protective paste. At this point I started rubbing the image between my hands creating heat. I was able to significantly darken the image yet keeping the red tones from showing up. I am going to practice this technique as it has thus far produced the best tones and contrast.
Labels:
Impossible Film Tests
Friday, April 2, 2010
First Flush - PX100 (New Polaroid film)
I took the new instant film being produced by the Impossible Project for my first test shoot today. The rumors on the street were this was a pretty tough film to dial in and very sensitive to temperature and light during developing. Please excuse the rough scans here (newton rings and all). I just wanted to get my first experience out there and let everyone get a feel for what worked for me and what didn't and hopefully I will start to see some other lessons learned from other shooters and we can all start to figure out this film.
These images were taken with my SX-70 Sonar. Everything was shoot in Alexandria VA, USA. For the outside shots most were in bright clear sunny conditions. Some of the last few were bright sunny hazy conditions with hazy cloud cover. The first shot was shot indoors, the exposure was a couple of seconds (guessing by the sound and delay), handheld, with the light/dark dial centered.
As you can see it looks very over exposed. Either the light meter in the camera gave to much exposure or maybe this film needs less light under these conditions. The reciprocity curve might not hold out here, though if that is the case this is the first film I know of that needs less light at long exposures.
The next shot was outside in full bright sun with a clear blue sky. Again the light/dark dial was centered. This seems to be the perfect conditions for this film. This is the best contrast I got all day.
The next shot was of an alley way with shade and sun, same light as the above shot. Again the dial was centered. I wanted to see how it handled a very contrasty scene. The image has less contrast then above, but all in all the film did pretty good here. You can already see this film is not going to be a very high contrast film. Actually it feels very much like Polaroid Chocolate shot with a Holga.
This next image was shot in the same bright sun with birght blue sky, but I moved the dial one tick mark toward the darker side (giving less exposure). You can see the muddiness that results and the much less contrast. Still this has potential. It does suggest that only very minor adjustments of the dial will be necessary.
This image was shot an hour or so later. It is still bright and sunny, but now there was a thin layer of clouds basically turning the sky into a big bright softbox. The subjects were further away here. And all in all the contrast is way down and I did notice this film has problems with object far away, they always seem to be hazy. Dial was centered again.
Same exact conditions as the above image.
The conditions here were the same as well, but I moved the dial half way to the next mark toward the lighter side (more exposure). You do see a slight increase in detail in the tree line and the water seems brighter.
Finally I put the dial back to center. Same weather conditions. This time I put the film in my pants pocket and kept my hand over it to warm up the film. This film is supposed to get a red hue if the developing temperatures get to hot. You can see the added heat does start to give some red hues, it also caused the image to darken much more. Essentially this the same image as image 6 (same settings and conditions, take probably 5 minutes apart). Yet this is much darker. I now wonder if under these bright hazy conditions you might overexpose a bit and then develop in your pocket to create a better image.
My first impressions are that this film has potential. It is going to take some time to really dial it in and find the right lighting conditions to really make it shine. I will say it has allot of potential if you combine it with some Photoshop post processing. At the retail price this is going to be expensive to learn this film. Hopefully if enough of those who use it share their experiences we can collectively figure it out fast :)
These images were taken with my SX-70 Sonar. Everything was shoot in Alexandria VA, USA. For the outside shots most were in bright clear sunny conditions. Some of the last few were bright sunny hazy conditions with hazy cloud cover. The first shot was shot indoors, the exposure was a couple of seconds (guessing by the sound and delay), handheld, with the light/dark dial centered.
As you can see it looks very over exposed. Either the light meter in the camera gave to much exposure or maybe this film needs less light under these conditions. The reciprocity curve might not hold out here, though if that is the case this is the first film I know of that needs less light at long exposures.
The next shot was outside in full bright sun with a clear blue sky. Again the light/dark dial was centered. This seems to be the perfect conditions for this film. This is the best contrast I got all day.
The next shot was of an alley way with shade and sun, same light as the above shot. Again the dial was centered. I wanted to see how it handled a very contrasty scene. The image has less contrast then above, but all in all the film did pretty good here. You can already see this film is not going to be a very high contrast film. Actually it feels very much like Polaroid Chocolate shot with a Holga.
This next image was shot in the same bright sun with birght blue sky, but I moved the dial one tick mark toward the darker side (giving less exposure). You can see the muddiness that results and the much less contrast. Still this has potential. It does suggest that only very minor adjustments of the dial will be necessary.
This image was shot an hour or so later. It is still bright and sunny, but now there was a thin layer of clouds basically turning the sky into a big bright softbox. The subjects were further away here. And all in all the contrast is way down and I did notice this film has problems with object far away, they always seem to be hazy. Dial was centered again.
Same exact conditions as the above image.
The conditions here were the same as well, but I moved the dial half way to the next mark toward the lighter side (more exposure). You do see a slight increase in detail in the tree line and the water seems brighter.
Finally I put the dial back to center. Same weather conditions. This time I put the film in my pants pocket and kept my hand over it to warm up the film. This film is supposed to get a red hue if the developing temperatures get to hot. You can see the added heat does start to give some red hues, it also caused the image to darken much more. Essentially this the same image as image 6 (same settings and conditions, take probably 5 minutes apart). Yet this is much darker. I now wonder if under these bright hazy conditions you might overexpose a bit and then develop in your pocket to create a better image.
My first impressions are that this film has potential. It is going to take some time to really dial it in and find the right lighting conditions to really make it shine. I will say it has allot of potential if you combine it with some Photoshop post processing. At the retail price this is going to be expensive to learn this film. Hopefully if enough of those who use it share their experiences we can collectively figure it out fast :)
Labels:
Impossible Film Tests
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)